Post by account_disabled on Jan 17, 2024 8:47:36 GMT
To resolve these issues, the TS interprets articles 28 of the Jurisdiction Law and 106 and 110 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, since the appeal concerns, not on whether or not Ms. Gregoria had the right to the professional career supplement, a question not discussed, but rather on the way in which she should be recognized and the scope that this recognition should have over time. Well, the Supreme Court responds to the question of cassational interest raised with the identical arguments used in previous rulings that resolved the same question of cassational interest. Specifically, it transcribes the arguments of the first of them, that of November 28, 2021. In essence, it indicates that temporary statutory personnel have the right to a professional career because this is part of the working conditions. Furthermore, there is no longer any controversy regarding the underlying issue since it has been resolved and the appellant Castilian-La Mancha Administration itself recognizes it in its filing. The ruling .
states that the way provided by our legal system to remove administrative acts that were not appealed in time, but which are charged with a defect of nullity by operation of law, is the one provided for by article 106 of Law 39/ 2015. The Whatsapp Number List Supreme Court agrees with the Board of Communities of Castilla-La Mancha , upholding its appeal, which entails the annulment[5] of the sentence handed down by the Albacete Court and the consequent annulment of the lower court, upholding in part the contentious-administrative appeal: According to this ruling, Ms. Gregoria's substantive claim is based on Law , since “the maintenance of the situation created by the resolution o.
f October 29, 2010, by which the effects of recognition of degree II were denied of the professional career while it was not permanent, meant prolonging its discrimination with respect to the permanent statutory personnel who had obtained that same recognition (…)”. Supreme Court. (Photo: E&J) This circumstance, not discussed by the Administration, was already evident at the time Ms. Gregoria presented her claim, so said claim should have been taken as an ex officio review request . However, the Administration did not do so (in fact, it has continued to deny ex officio review requests with the same basis as Ms. requirement.
states that the way provided by our legal system to remove administrative acts that were not appealed in time, but which are charged with a defect of nullity by operation of law, is the one provided for by article 106 of Law 39/ 2015. The Whatsapp Number List Supreme Court agrees with the Board of Communities of Castilla-La Mancha , upholding its appeal, which entails the annulment[5] of the sentence handed down by the Albacete Court and the consequent annulment of the lower court, upholding in part the contentious-administrative appeal: According to this ruling, Ms. Gregoria's substantive claim is based on Law , since “the maintenance of the situation created by the resolution o.
f October 29, 2010, by which the effects of recognition of degree II were denied of the professional career while it was not permanent, meant prolonging its discrimination with respect to the permanent statutory personnel who had obtained that same recognition (…)”. Supreme Court. (Photo: E&J) This circumstance, not discussed by the Administration, was already evident at the time Ms. Gregoria presented her claim, so said claim should have been taken as an ex officio review request . However, the Administration did not do so (in fact, it has continued to deny ex officio review requests with the same basis as Ms. requirement.